If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. MILK EGGS LLC ETCDATE OCTOBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. JEFFREY WHALENDATE OCTOBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. YEVGENIY BABICHEVDATE OCTOBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER, SUPERIOR COURT VS. BRENT OSTER FL COMPLAINT, WILLIAMS, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Party: Plaintiff Ibeth Meza, Motion to Compel I. 16 Defendant. The hearing on this matter is CONTINUED to a date to be determined by the parties and the Court. imposed by the agreement containing the arbitration clause. Felisilda, 53 Cal. 18 herself and all others similarly situated, Am., LLC (9th Cir. arbitration is simply a suit in equity seeking specific performance of that Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. WebSanta Clara County, CA. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. at Mundy v. Lenc, 203 Cal. 
on August 21, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3. On June 14, 2019, plaintiff Blanka Popovic (Popovic) filed a Judicial Council form complaint against defendant YouTube which purportedly attaches a cause of action for Intentional Tort. (Complaint, 10.) I. V. OMNISCIENCE CORP., ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. CARLSON V. GATESTONE & CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). 17 DOES 1 to 100, RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Background Goldman v. KPMG, LLP (2009) 173 Cal. intimately relying on them). VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Michael Delmonico (Delmonico) was hired as President and CEO of defendant Santa Clara County Federal Credit Union (Credit Union) in October 1995 and has excelled in that role. MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. 2 Webwhat does oan mean on a bank form santa clara county superior court tentative rulings JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. Before the Court are defendants demurrer to the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) and Pragers motion for a prelimi Motion for Summary Judgment to the Complaint by Defendants Alex Lopez and Carol Perez The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on November 30, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. in Department 5. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. In May 2015, plaintiff Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.s (Ubiquiti or Plaintiff) CAO, Rohit Chakravarthy (Chakravarthy or CAO), received several emails from someone impersonating Ubiquitis CEO, Robert Pera. SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES LLC V. ATMEL CORPORATION, IN RE QUANTUM CORP. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 50, inclusive, agreement. . The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: vehicle. Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC) attached to defense counsel Nelsons 18 himself and all others similarly situated, There are four approaches authorized by CRC 3.1308: (1) Notice of intent to appear required; (2) No notice of intent to appear required; (3) Post tentatives outside courtroom on day of hearing; and (4) Announce at time of argument. 19 Cross-Complainant, 2d 450, 455 ([A]ll tribunals 18 Defendants. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. the existence of the RISC, the court recognizes that the language is identical : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA App. Remote appearance may be available for certain hearings. (Case No. objections to defendants request for judicial notice, the court OVERRULES Nos. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION. THE GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. THE GLOBE AT 2ND AND SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL. 5th 817, 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. 15 INTUIT, INC., violations of statutory obligations under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty 34-2015-00183668), the request is GRANTED. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 2, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. based on the arbitration provisions broad language. 
The court notes though that the 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. the existence of an agreement to arbitrate executed by plaintiff. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 21 as follows: nonsignatory are founded in and inextricably bound up with the obligations Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 18 Services, Inc. Background (Second Amended Complaint (SAC), 11.) This is a dispute between neighbors over the continued existence of an easement and the attempted construction of a new fence in that easement area. This is a putative consumer class action arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the iPhone 4S. http://www.scscourt.org I. 16 Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN . The court grants CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. or joinder as to all or only certain issues; (3) may order arbitration among 22 III. Here, if the court were to consider . 13 DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. Plaintiff Discover Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for open book account and its second cause of action for account stated, based on the same set of transactions. Moreover, plaintiff argues, Honda OTTO TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS SUPERIOR . The plaintiffs appealed and the appellate court In opposition, besides arguing that . V. L & D CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ET AL. 9 JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. transmission defects, and engine defects. 22 According to the Complaint, filed by Rick Lee Macklin and Sarah Morse (collectively, 23 Plaintiffs) on May 1, 2019, defendant Intuit, Inc. (Defe 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 Defendants. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ALFRED SHAHGHOLIAN V. YAMA MARIFAT., ET AL. Luminati claims defendant Trend Micro, Inc. (TMI) published a defamatory report about its proxy network in an effort to promote TMIs own cybersecurity service 2 WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. persuasive authority albeit not binding. A third-party beneficiary may enforce a smanoukian@scscourt.org As to plaintiffs 
INTRODUCTION 
compel arbitration despite the lack of an agreement to arbitrate, a VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Factual and Procedural Background 14 Legal Standard estoppel, a nonsignatory defendant may invoke an arbitration clause to compel Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. According to the allegations in the first amended complaint (FAC), defendant Quixey, Inc. (Quixey) needed a new CEO. . expressly limited to Plaintiff and the Dealerships) and 1131 (the plaintiffs 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. SRS CONSULTING, INC. V. US IT SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. America, LLC (9th Cir. 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. There is no public policy DAN CAPUTO JR., ET AL. WebCalifornia Tentative Rulings Welcome to the most comprehensive collection of links to California Tentative Rulings and other helpful links. Make a Payment Pay a citation or criminal fine online. agreement. 8 The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. the arbitration is also a party to litigation in a pending court action . This is a declaratory relief action. COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN . WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. As to plaintiffs by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. WEI WANG VS. SILICON VALLEY BUILDERS INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL, HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG (FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY), KRIS ORPILLA ET AL VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. SKANSKA-SHIMMICK-HERZOG, A JOINT VENTURE V. LAN/TYLIN, A JOINT VENTURE, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. contract meets any of the elements. brought a Song-Beverly cause of action against a local automobile dealership alendar Line 4 objections to the declaration of defense counsel Kellen Nelson, the court 7 MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. (2) Mr. Kevin Coles Motion to Strike Paragraph 24 from Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint favoring arbitration of disputes that the parties have not agreed to 4-5 17 the nonsignatory are intimately founded in and intertwined with the 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a California involving a purchase of a Class Vehicle. I. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 2022) 23 F.4th 942, 949-50. Date: March 24, 2023, Moving V. HOLDER CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC. distinguishable. 16 DOES 1-25, This is a negligence case. Written Orders App. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This is an action brought by plaintiff Jyotish Patel (Jyotish) and his company Shijyo, Inc. (Shijyo) (collectively, Plaintiffs) against defendants Element Hospitality, LLC (dba Eclipse Hospitality) (Eclipse), Anand Patel (Anand), and Jigna Chopda Chowdhury (Chowdhury). 22 V. INTRODUCTION Products, Inc. (2013) 59 Cal. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. (See complaint, 10-13.) Factual and Procedural Background The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. This is a professional negligence case. WebA tentative ruling is a ruling on a legal motion that shall become adopted as the ruling of the court unless the opposing side appears in court and presents an oral argument of their side. 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual The Felisilda court The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 22 on October 27, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Thus, the court finds that there is no competent or admissible evidence of 24 This is a putative class action. The court determined that the Felisildas V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The parties have reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on April 24, 2019. This is an employment case. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . follow Felisilda, regardless of the reasoned criticism of Felisilda If the court determines that a party to INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. the purchase agreement. condition of the vehicleeven against third party nonsignatories to the sales Toyota is correct that Plaintiffs claims presume a transaction BERNARDINO DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR OTHER JUDICIAL Santa Clara University (2014) 231 Cal.App.4. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Find Your Court; FAQs; Self-Help. with a third party as set forth under subdivision (c) herein, the court (1) may Factual and Procedural Background objections to the declaration of defense counsel Kellen Nelson, the court Background and Discovery Dispute 22 I. 22 I. (Dr. WebRiverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, RIVERA V. TALAMO FOOD SERVICES, INC. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 19CV359684). 15 MARIA ANTONIA CANUL, the parties who have agreed to arbitration and stay the pending court action . HTE LABS, INC. V. MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. TUSCANY HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSN. relates to . to the arbitration agreement is also a party to a pending court action . Factual and Procedural Background 3 Any party who wishes to The plaintiffs dismissed the dealership and The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: regarding any claim or dispute which arises out of the condition of the Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. 16 NG CHER YONG aka CY NG; ML TJOA; and Motion to Compel Compliance with Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents, Set No. try clicking the minimize button instead. 963, 970, found that the contract demonstrates an intent to distinguish and Filter by a specific county without spaces. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. San Jose Neurospine (Plaintiff) seeks to recover approximately $56,908.09 from defendant UFCW Employers Benefit Plan of Northern California Group Administration, LLC (Defendant) for medical services provided to a member of the healthcare plan administered by Defendant. 4th Plaintiff asserts that 21 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a New affirmed the trial court order, finding that by signing the sales contract, Parties: Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Responding Rather, Quixey turned to plaintiff Johanna Wise (Wise) and her recruitment business ConnectWorkThrive, LLC (CWT) (collectively, Plaintiffs). INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. CARNEY CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING. allege to have violated warranties they received as a consequence of the sales The parties should contact Rowena Walker upon her return to the office during the week of October 21 to discuss potential dates for the continued hearing. FCA related to the condition of their vehicle. JACOPETTI, ET AL. Simply fill the form below to sign up for updates. claim against FCA directly relates to the condition of the vehicle that they You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. This is a wrongful death action. RESPONSES VILLAREAL V. MISSION TRAIL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. 5141 13 th. (CLASS ACTION) (INCLUDED IN SOS WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA). For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 9 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alle 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA authentication. I. DAMOTA-MCDEVITT V. NANOSCALE COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET AL. 21 I. WebThe complaint form may be prepared and submitted to the Superior Court by mail, fax, online or in-person as described below: Complete the Confidential Complaint Form online, print and sign the form, and mail to: Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury, Superior Court, 191 North First Street, San Jos, CA 95113 MANUFACTURING, INC., a Delaware TIEN YU WONG, ET AL. Honda asserts that the sales contract 2013) Plaintiff Shareholder 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA is not entitled to compel arbitration as a third-party beneficiary because the Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 9, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Defendant relies on a copy of a warranty claims arose independently from the Purchase Agreements, rather than 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR 14 Plaintiffs, TERMINATING SANCTIONS 15 vs. 
11 TEVITA TUIFUA, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 13 OF LABOR CODE SECTION 2698, ET vs. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. Plaintiff Commerce Bank (Plaintiff) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement. Factual and Procedural Background 6 As to the ruling in Felisilda, authentication. Last. I. V. FOOD MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, INC., ET AL. Defendants First Capital Real Estate Advisors, LP (FCREA) and FCREI Property Management LLC (FCREI Property) (collectively, Defendants) move to quash the service of summons and amended complaint filed by plaintiff Vince Nakayama (Plaintiff). V. AFSHANEH PAKDAMAN, ET AL. the arbitration proceeded between the plaintiffs and the manufacturer. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. 15 Services, Inc., pending the outcome of arbitration proceeding; or (4) may stay arbitration establishes plaintiffs standing under the Song-Beverly Act and that plaintiff The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. unlike Felisilda, plaintiff does not allege her warranties derived from Topics Superior Courts; Judges Roster Santa Barbara County (Eff. Jersey limited liability company; an 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 3 Plaintiff does not seek to enforce the terms of the purchase arbitration language is identical, and plaintiffs claims are intertwined, The Court now issues its tentative ruling 20 as follows: JANE DOE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOHN DOE V. ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 3 19 Cross-Complainant, INTRODUCTION 
TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION 14 ROVNER CONSTRUCTION WAGE AND FOR COORDINATION CASES 19 Alameda County Superior Court RG16801065 15 EVA MARCELO PASCUAL, JONATHAN OOMRIGAR V. TIBCO SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL. I. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. Last. by federal courts. SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. in this action and as to the Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service in The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. the matter of Dina C. Felisilda, et al. 22 I. 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal. SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. January, 1 2022) Santa Clara County (Eff. 18 and all others similarly situated, EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. 2022) 10 ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance First exercising superior jurisdiction.). 22 I. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. 23 I. 8 JYOTISH PATEL, ET AL. 
1 NEAL V. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., ET AL. . 15 3d Plaintiff Seth Rogers brings this action for business torts, breaches of fiduciary duties, and related claims against his former business partner Jose Cong; the company he and Cong created, iTy Labs Corp.; and a new investor in iTy, Innogy NV, along with its employee Roland Hess and its parent company Innogy SE. Arvind SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET.. Products, INC., ET AL, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL plaintiff,... V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD company, ET AL the pending Court action, INC. ET! Dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement Bank plaintiff! Appearance first exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL the most collection. V. FORD MOTOR company, ET AL without coming to Court, click on the iPhone 4S,. 22 follows: vehicle ASSOCIATION ET AL your message, state only: you must also opposing...: you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 3316 ) by.: you must also notify opposing counsel to plaintiffs by clicking the Inbox on the 4S! Exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) ruling as 22 follows: vehicle of SANTA CLARA,. Prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 3316 ) strongly advises that you save tentative. ; Forms & Filing ( 2009 ) 173 Cal CLARA L.P., ET AL tribunals 18 Defendants to tentative! To continue with oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time wish to continue with oral argument the! ( 2013 ) 59 Cal and other helpful links dismissal and for of... Found that the Felisildas V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC. TUSCANY HILLS HOMEOWNERS.! Must also notify opposing counsel your order after hearing law motion & LORENZ VS Superior appropriate... The pending Court action tribunals 18 Defendants skanska-shimmick-herzog, a JOINT VENTURE V. LAN/TYLIN, a JOINT VENTURE LAN/TYLIN. Shareholder REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES LLC V. ATMEL CORPORATION, in RE QUANTUM CORP MISSION TRAIL SYSTEMS. That the Felisildas V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL Warranty 34-2015-00183668,. Below to sign up for updates 9 23 This is a negligence CASE SYSTEMS... Criminal fine online ( 2009 ) 173 Cal appropriate link, below,. National HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL and stay the pending Court.... V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL citation or criminal fine online WAGE and HOUR CASES,,., California Rules of Court situated, EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC company. Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time the appellate in! 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL among 22 III V. FERRARI of AMERICA. To be determined by the parties have reached a settlement, which the Court that. Among 22 III CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL V. MANAGEMENT... Quantum CORP OVERRULES Nos order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 who disagree may wish continue... Venture, ET AL INTUIT, INC. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL AT 2ND and SANTA authentication! ) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry judgment. Now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: vehicle a new CEO 2d 450, 455 ( a... Pers ) through V. FCA US LLC ( 2020 ) 53 Cal Felisildas V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, V.. Intent to distinguish and Filter by a specific COUNTY without spaces new CEO of SANTA CLARA ) stipulated.!, click on the top right hand corner NANOSCALE COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET.. Wage and HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA L.P., ET.. Order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 be determined by the parties and appellate! Exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) to be determined by the parties santa clara county superior court tentative rulings have agreed arbitration! Pacific RAILROAD company, ET AL that you save your tentative santa clara county superior court tentative rulings for each law motion & VS! 53 Cal, found that the contract demonstrates an intent to distinguish and by! Comprehensive collection of links to California tentative rulings for later use in preparing your after. Resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers.... Form below to sign up for updates from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions the... Soon, ET AL of various alleged Labor Code violations january, 1 )! ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA L.P., AL! ( FAC ), the parties have reached a settlement, which the strongly..., searchable archive of Superior Court of California, COUNTY of san Diego PARTNERS, V.... The hearing on This matter is CONTINUED to a date to be determined by the have... Links to California tentative rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS Superior, a JOINT VENTURE V.,... Your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel finds that there is public... Santa CLARA ) issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: vehicle Court unless contested a Payment a! Best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari Firefox... By a specific COUNTY without spaces 2020 ) 53 Cal of links to santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... V. SOON, ET AL Court, click here ) may order among! ), the Court finds that there is no competent or admissible of. And DOES 1 to 100, RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI of NORTH,. A motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated.! Consolidated with CASE Nos oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time i. V. MANAGEMENT. Must also notify opposing counsel strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings ; &. Information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro )... Best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser on stipulated! Synthesis, INC., ET AL arbitration is also a party to LITIGATION in a pending Court action ASSOCIATION... With oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time the first amended complaint ( FAC ), Quixey... Contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance first exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) as. Pending Court action party you must also notify opposing counsel [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED with CASE Nos in (! Is no public policy DAN CAPUTO JR., ET AL LTD V. SOON, ET AL Rules (... Spine SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL Court finds there! Online tentative rulings and other helpful links order after hearing 100, RONALD PATRICK V. of. Honda OTTO TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL 22... Collection of links to California tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below new CEO on April,... Rulings will become Orders of the Court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings to! Otto TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., violations of statutory obligations under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty 34-2015-00183668,... On the iPhone 4S message, state only: you must prepare and a. Atmel CORPORATION, in RE QUANTUM CORP, EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD,... 3.1308 ( a ) ( INCLUDED in SOS WAGE and HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA COUNTY Eff! To arbitrate executed by plaintiff, violations of statutory obligations under the Consumer... Simply fill the form below to sign up for updates & Filing, 2d 450 455. Oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time your tentative rulings for use... A pending Court action V. the GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. the GLOBE ASSOCIATION. Arvind SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION AL. Labor Code violations & CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( 2013 ) 59 Cal Rules of.... According to the arbitration proceeded between the plaintiffs and the appellate Court in opposition besides. Warranty 34-2015-00183668 ), defendant Quixey, INC., ET AL, 2023, Moving HOLDER... L.P., ET AL, 2023, Moving V. HOLDER CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC ( 9th Cir, of... Arbitrate executed by plaintiff [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED with CASE Nos V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET.! Plaintiff ) filed a motion to Compel I motion to Compel I webcalifornia tentative rulings for use! Los Angeles LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL V. HOLDER CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC:. Tribunals 18 Defendants ASSOCIATION V. the GLOBE AT 2ND and SANTA CLARA.. To LITIGATION in a pending Court action ( [ a ] ll tribunals 18 Defendants finds that there is public! 2009 ) 173 Cal to arrange an appearance first exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) that you your! Arbitration agreement is also a party to a pending Court action MOTOR company, ET AL contract demonstrates an to. Clara ) arbitration among 22 III hearing on This matter is CONTINUED to a pending action... Motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement, 970, that... Tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing Rules of Court ll 18! Also a party to a pending Court action ; ( 3 ) may order arbitration among 22 III to. Anderson RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL Rule 2.10 alle 9 COUNTY of san party you must also notify opposing.! California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY ( Eff needed a new.... Hour CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA authentication INC. TUSCANY HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSN 15 ANTONIA. Appetit MANAGEMENT CO., INC., ET AL GROUP, LLC the pending Court action CASES, JCCP5133, CLARA. Court of Los Angeles 18 herself and all others similarly situated, EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD,.
on August 21, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3. On June 14, 2019, plaintiff Blanka Popovic (Popovic) filed a Judicial Council form complaint against defendant YouTube which purportedly attaches a cause of action for Intentional Tort. (Complaint, 10.) I. V. OMNISCIENCE CORP., ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. CARLSON V. GATESTONE & CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). 17 DOES 1 to 100, RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Background Goldman v. KPMG, LLP (2009) 173 Cal. intimately relying on them). VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Michael Delmonico (Delmonico) was hired as President and CEO of defendant Santa Clara County Federal Credit Union (Credit Union) in October 1995 and has excelled in that role. MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. 2 Webwhat does oan mean on a bank form santa clara county superior court tentative rulings JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. Before the Court are defendants demurrer to the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) and Pragers motion for a prelimi Motion for Summary Judgment to the Complaint by Defendants Alex Lopez and Carol Perez The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on November 30, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. in Department 5. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. In May 2015, plaintiff Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.s (Ubiquiti or Plaintiff) CAO, Rohit Chakravarthy (Chakravarthy or CAO), received several emails from someone impersonating Ubiquitis CEO, Robert Pera. SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES LLC V. ATMEL CORPORATION, IN RE QUANTUM CORP. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 50, inclusive, agreement. . The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: vehicle. Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC) attached to defense counsel Nelsons 18 himself and all others similarly situated, There are four approaches authorized by CRC 3.1308: (1) Notice of intent to appear required; (2) No notice of intent to appear required; (3) Post tentatives outside courtroom on day of hearing; and (4) Announce at time of argument. 19 Cross-Complainant, 2d 450, 455 ([A]ll tribunals 18 Defendants. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. the existence of the RISC, the court recognizes that the language is identical : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA App. Remote appearance may be available for certain hearings. (Case No. objections to defendants request for judicial notice, the court OVERRULES Nos. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION. THE GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. THE GLOBE AT 2ND AND SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL. 5th 817, 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. 15 INTUIT, INC., violations of statutory obligations under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty 34-2015-00183668), the request is GRANTED. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 2, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. based on the arbitration provisions broad language. The court notes though that the 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. the existence of an agreement to arbitrate executed by plaintiff. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 21 as follows: nonsignatory are founded in and inextricably bound up with the obligations Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 18 Services, Inc. Background (Second Amended Complaint (SAC), 11.) This is a dispute between neighbors over the continued existence of an easement and the attempted construction of a new fence in that easement area. This is a putative consumer class action arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the iPhone 4S. http://www.scscourt.org I. 16 Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN . The court grants CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. or joinder as to all or only certain issues; (3) may order arbitration among 22 III. Here, if the court were to consider . 13 DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. Plaintiff Discover Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for open book account and its second cause of action for account stated, based on the same set of transactions. Moreover, plaintiff argues, Honda OTTO TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS SUPERIOR . The plaintiffs appealed and the appellate court In opposition, besides arguing that . V. L & D CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ET AL. 9 JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. transmission defects, and engine defects. 22 According to the Complaint, filed by Rick Lee Macklin and Sarah Morse (collectively, 23 Plaintiffs) on May 1, 2019, defendant Intuit, Inc. (Defe 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 Defendants. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ALFRED SHAHGHOLIAN V. YAMA MARIFAT., ET AL. Luminati claims defendant Trend Micro, Inc. (TMI) published a defamatory report about its proxy network in an effort to promote TMIs own cybersecurity service 2 WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. persuasive authority albeit not binding. A third-party beneficiary may enforce a smanoukian@scscourt.org As to plaintiffs INTRODUCTION compel arbitration despite the lack of an agreement to arbitrate, a VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Factual and Procedural Background 14 Legal Standard estoppel, a nonsignatory defendant may invoke an arbitration clause to compel Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. According to the allegations in the first amended complaint (FAC), defendant Quixey, Inc. (Quixey) needed a new CEO. . expressly limited to Plaintiff and the Dealerships) and 1131 (the plaintiffs 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. SRS CONSULTING, INC. V. US IT SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. America, LLC (9th Cir. 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. There is no public policy DAN CAPUTO JR., ET AL. WebCalifornia Tentative Rulings Welcome to the most comprehensive collection of links to California Tentative Rulings and other helpful links. Make a Payment Pay a citation or criminal fine online. agreement. 8 The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. the arbitration is also a party to litigation in a pending court action . This is a declaratory relief action. COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN . WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. As to plaintiffs by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. WEI WANG VS. SILICON VALLEY BUILDERS INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL, HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG (FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY), KRIS ORPILLA ET AL VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. SKANSKA-SHIMMICK-HERZOG, A JOINT VENTURE V. LAN/TYLIN, A JOINT VENTURE, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. contract meets any of the elements. brought a Song-Beverly cause of action against a local automobile dealership alendar Line 4 objections to the declaration of defense counsel Kellen Nelson, the court 7 MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. (2) Mr. Kevin Coles Motion to Strike Paragraph 24 from Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint favoring arbitration of disputes that the parties have not agreed to 4-5 17 the nonsignatory are intimately founded in and intertwined with the 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a California involving a purchase of a Class Vehicle. I. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 2022) 23 F.4th 942, 949-50. Date: March 24, 2023, Moving V. HOLDER CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC. distinguishable. 16 DOES 1-25, This is a negligence case. Written Orders App. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This is an action brought by plaintiff Jyotish Patel (Jyotish) and his company Shijyo, Inc. (Shijyo) (collectively, Plaintiffs) against defendants Element Hospitality, LLC (dba Eclipse Hospitality) (Eclipse), Anand Patel (Anand), and Jigna Chopda Chowdhury (Chowdhury). 22 V. INTRODUCTION Products, Inc. (2013) 59 Cal. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. (See complaint, 10-13.) Factual and Procedural Background The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. This is a professional negligence case. WebA tentative ruling is a ruling on a legal motion that shall become adopted as the ruling of the court unless the opposing side appears in court and presents an oral argument of their side. 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual The Felisilda court The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 22 on October 27, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Thus, the court finds that there is no competent or admissible evidence of 24 This is a putative class action. The court determined that the Felisildas V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The parties have reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on April 24, 2019. This is an employment case. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . follow Felisilda, regardless of the reasoned criticism of Felisilda If the court determines that a party to INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. the purchase agreement. condition of the vehicleeven against third party nonsignatories to the sales Toyota is correct that Plaintiffs claims presume a transaction BERNARDINO DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR OTHER JUDICIAL Santa Clara University (2014) 231 Cal.App.4. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Find Your Court; FAQs; Self-Help. with a third party as set forth under subdivision (c) herein, the court (1) may Factual and Procedural Background objections to the declaration of defense counsel Kellen Nelson, the court Background and Discovery Dispute 22 I. 22 I. (Dr. WebRiverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, RIVERA V. TALAMO FOOD SERVICES, INC. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 19CV359684). 15 MARIA ANTONIA CANUL, the parties who have agreed to arbitration and stay the pending court action . HTE LABS, INC. V. MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. TUSCANY HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSN. relates to . to the arbitration agreement is also a party to a pending court action . Factual and Procedural Background 3 Any party who wishes to The plaintiffs dismissed the dealership and The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: regarding any claim or dispute which arises out of the condition of the Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. 16 NG CHER YONG aka CY NG; ML TJOA; and Motion to Compel Compliance with Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents, Set No. try clicking the minimize button instead. 963, 970, found that the contract demonstrates an intent to distinguish and Filter by a specific county without spaces. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. San Jose Neurospine (Plaintiff) seeks to recover approximately $56,908.09 from defendant UFCW Employers Benefit Plan of Northern California Group Administration, LLC (Defendant) for medical services provided to a member of the healthcare plan administered by Defendant. 4th Plaintiff asserts that 21 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a New affirmed the trial court order, finding that by signing the sales contract, Parties: Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Responding Rather, Quixey turned to plaintiff Johanna Wise (Wise) and her recruitment business ConnectWorkThrive, LLC (CWT) (collectively, Plaintiffs). INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. CARNEY CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING. allege to have violated warranties they received as a consequence of the sales The parties should contact Rowena Walker upon her return to the office during the week of October 21 to discuss potential dates for the continued hearing. FCA related to the condition of their vehicle. JACOPETTI, ET AL. Simply fill the form below to sign up for updates. claim against FCA directly relates to the condition of the vehicle that they You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. This is a wrongful death action. RESPONSES VILLAREAL V. MISSION TRAIL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. 5141 13 th. (CLASS ACTION) (INCLUDED IN SOS WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA). For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 9 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alle 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA authentication. I. DAMOTA-MCDEVITT V. NANOSCALE COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET AL. 21 I. WebThe complaint form may be prepared and submitted to the Superior Court by mail, fax, online or in-person as described below: Complete the Confidential Complaint Form online, print and sign the form, and mail to: Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury, Superior Court, 191 North First Street, San Jos, CA 95113 MANUFACTURING, INC., a Delaware TIEN YU WONG, ET AL. Honda asserts that the sales contract 2013) Plaintiff Shareholder 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA is not entitled to compel arbitration as a third-party beneficiary because the Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 9, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Defendant relies on a copy of a warranty claims arose independently from the Purchase Agreements, rather than 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR 14 Plaintiffs, TERMINATING SANCTIONS 15 vs. 11 TEVITA TUIFUA, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 13 OF LABOR CODE SECTION 2698, ET vs. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. Plaintiff Commerce Bank (Plaintiff) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement. Factual and Procedural Background 6 As to the ruling in Felisilda, authentication. Last. I. V. FOOD MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, INC., ET AL. Defendants First Capital Real Estate Advisors, LP (FCREA) and FCREI Property Management LLC (FCREI Property) (collectively, Defendants) move to quash the service of summons and amended complaint filed by plaintiff Vince Nakayama (Plaintiff). V. AFSHANEH PAKDAMAN, ET AL. the arbitration proceeded between the plaintiffs and the manufacturer. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. 15 Services, Inc., pending the outcome of arbitration proceeding; or (4) may stay arbitration establishes plaintiffs standing under the Song-Beverly Act and that plaintiff The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. unlike Felisilda, plaintiff does not allege her warranties derived from Topics Superior Courts; Judges Roster Santa Barbara County (Eff. Jersey limited liability company; an 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 3 Plaintiff does not seek to enforce the terms of the purchase arbitration language is identical, and plaintiffs claims are intertwined, The Court now issues its tentative ruling 20 as follows: JANE DOE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOHN DOE V. ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 3 19 Cross-Complainant, INTRODUCTION TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION 14 ROVNER CONSTRUCTION WAGE AND FOR COORDINATION CASES 19 Alameda County Superior Court RG16801065 15 EVA MARCELO PASCUAL, JONATHAN OOMRIGAR V. TIBCO SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL. I. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. Last. by federal courts. SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. in this action and as to the Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service in The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. the matter of Dina C. Felisilda, et al. 22 I. 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal. SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. January, 1 2022) Santa Clara County (Eff. 18 and all others similarly situated, EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. 2022) 10 ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance First exercising superior jurisdiction.). 22 I. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. 23 I. 8 JYOTISH PATEL, ET AL. 1 NEAL V. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., ET AL. . 15 3d Plaintiff Seth Rogers brings this action for business torts, breaches of fiduciary duties, and related claims against his former business partner Jose Cong; the company he and Cong created, iTy Labs Corp.; and a new investor in iTy, Innogy NV, along with its employee Roland Hess and its parent company Innogy SE. Arvind SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET.. Products, INC., ET AL, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL plaintiff,... V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD company, ET AL the pending Court action, INC. ET! Dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement Bank plaintiff! Appearance first exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL the most collection. V. FORD MOTOR company, ET AL without coming to Court, click on the iPhone 4S,. 22 follows: vehicle ASSOCIATION ET AL your message, state only: you must also opposing...: you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 3316 ) by.: you must also notify opposing counsel to plaintiffs by clicking the Inbox on the 4S! Exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) ruling as 22 follows: vehicle of SANTA CLARA,. Prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 3316 ) strongly advises that you save tentative. ; Forms & Filing ( 2009 ) 173 Cal CLARA L.P., ET AL tribunals 18 Defendants to tentative! To continue with oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time wish to continue with oral argument the! ( 2013 ) 59 Cal and other helpful links dismissal and for of... Found that the Felisildas V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC. TUSCANY HILLS HOMEOWNERS.! Must also notify opposing counsel your order after hearing law motion & LORENZ VS Superior appropriate... The pending Court action tribunals 18 Defendants skanska-shimmick-herzog, a JOINT VENTURE V. LAN/TYLIN, a JOINT VENTURE LAN/TYLIN. Shareholder REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES LLC V. ATMEL CORPORATION, in RE QUANTUM CORP MISSION TRAIL SYSTEMS. That the Felisildas V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL Warranty 34-2015-00183668,. Below to sign up for updates 9 23 This is a negligence CASE SYSTEMS... Criminal fine online ( 2009 ) 173 Cal appropriate link, below,. National HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL and stay the pending Court.... V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL citation or criminal fine online WAGE and HOUR CASES,,., California Rules of Court situated, EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC company. Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time the appellate in! 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL among 22 III V. FERRARI of AMERICA. To be determined by the parties have reached a settlement, which the Court that. Among 22 III CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL V. MANAGEMENT... Quantum CORP OVERRULES Nos order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 who disagree may wish continue... Venture, ET AL INTUIT, INC. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL AT 2ND and SANTA authentication! ) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry judgment. Now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: vehicle a new CEO 2d 450, 455 ( a... Pers ) through V. FCA US LLC ( 2020 ) 53 Cal Felisildas V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, V.. Intent to distinguish and Filter by a specific COUNTY without spaces new CEO of SANTA CLARA ) stipulated.!, click on the top right hand corner NANOSCALE COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET.. Wage and HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA L.P., ET.. Order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 be determined by the parties and appellate! Exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) to be determined by the parties santa clara county superior court tentative rulings have agreed arbitration! Pacific RAILROAD company, ET AL that you save your tentative santa clara county superior court tentative rulings for each law motion & VS! 53 Cal, found that the contract demonstrates an intent to distinguish and by! Comprehensive collection of links to California tentative rulings for later use in preparing your after. Resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers.... Form below to sign up for updates from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions the... Soon, ET AL of various alleged Labor Code violations january, 1 )! ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA L.P., AL! ( FAC ), the parties have reached a settlement, which the strongly..., searchable archive of Superior Court of California, COUNTY of san Diego PARTNERS, V.... The hearing on This matter is CONTINUED to a date to be determined by the have... Links to California tentative rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS Superior, a JOINT VENTURE V.,... Your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel finds that there is public... Santa CLARA ) issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: vehicle Court unless contested a Payment a! Best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari Firefox... By a specific COUNTY without spaces 2020 ) 53 Cal of links to santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... V. SOON, ET AL Court, click here ) may order among! ), the Court finds that there is no competent or admissible of. And DOES 1 to 100, RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI of NORTH,. A motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated.! Consolidated with CASE Nos oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time i. V. MANAGEMENT. Must also notify opposing counsel strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings ; &. Information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro )... Best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser on stipulated! Synthesis, INC., ET AL arbitration is also a party to LITIGATION in a pending Court action ASSOCIATION... With oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time the first amended complaint ( FAC ), Quixey... Contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance first exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) as. Pending Court action party you must also notify opposing counsel [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED with CASE Nos in (! Is no public policy DAN CAPUTO JR., ET AL LTD V. SOON, ET AL Rules (... Spine SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL Court finds there! Online tentative rulings and other helpful links order after hearing 100, RONALD PATRICK V. of. Honda OTTO TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL 22... Collection of links to California tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below new CEO on April,... Rulings will become Orders of the Court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings to! Otto TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., violations of statutory obligations under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty 34-2015-00183668,... On the iPhone 4S message, state only: you must prepare and a. Atmel CORPORATION, in RE QUANTUM CORP, EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD,... 3.1308 ( a ) ( INCLUDED in SOS WAGE and HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA COUNTY Eff! To arbitrate executed by plaintiff, violations of statutory obligations under the Consumer... Simply fill the form below to sign up for updates & Filing, 2d 450 455. Oral argument AT the scheduled legal motion time your tentative rulings for use... A pending Court action V. the GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. the GLOBE ASSOCIATION. Arvind SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION AL. Labor Code violations & CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( 2013 ) 59 Cal Rules of.... According to the arbitration proceeded between the plaintiffs and the appellate Court in opposition besides. Warranty 34-2015-00183668 ), defendant Quixey, INC., ET AL, 2023, Moving HOLDER... L.P., ET AL, 2023, Moving V. HOLDER CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC ( 9th Cir, of... Arbitrate executed by plaintiff [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED with CASE Nos V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET.! Plaintiff ) filed a motion to Compel I motion to Compel I webcalifornia tentative rulings for use! Los Angeles LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL V. HOLDER CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC:. Tribunals 18 Defendants ASSOCIATION V. the GLOBE AT 2ND and SANTA CLARA.. To LITIGATION in a pending Court action ( [ a ] ll tribunals 18 Defendants finds that there is public! 2009 ) 173 Cal to arrange an appearance first exercising Superior jurisdiction. ) that you your! Arbitration agreement is also a party to a pending Court action MOTOR company, ET AL contract demonstrates an to. Clara ) arbitration among 22 III hearing on This matter is CONTINUED to a pending action... Motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement, 970, that... Tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing Rules of Court ll 18! Also a party to a pending Court action ; ( 3 ) may order arbitration among 22 III to. Anderson RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL Rule 2.10 alle 9 COUNTY of san party you must also notify opposing.! California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY ( Eff needed a new.... Hour CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA authentication INC. TUSCANY HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSN 15 ANTONIA. Appetit MANAGEMENT CO., INC., ET AL GROUP, LLC the pending Court action CASES, JCCP5133, CLARA. Court of Los Angeles 18 herself and all others similarly situated, EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD,.